On 30/06/2021 17:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/30/21 3:38 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 6/30/21 12:46 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
>>> Add assertion in pc_system_ovmf_table_find that verifies that the flash
>>> was indeed previously parsed (looking for the OVMF table) by
>>>
On 6/30/21 3:38 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 6/30/21 12:46 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
>> Add assertion in pc_system_ovmf_table_find that verifies that the flash
>> was indeed previously parsed (looking for the OVMF table) by
>> pc_system_parse_ovmf_flash.
>>
>> Now pc_system_ovmf_table_find
On 6/30/21 12:46 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
> Add assertion in pc_system_ovmf_table_find that verifies that the flash
> was indeed previously parsed (looking for the OVMF table) by
> pc_system_parse_ovmf_flash.
>
> Now pc_system_ovmf_table_find distinguishes between "no one called
>
On 30/06/2021 11:23, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/30/21 7:46 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
>> Add assertion in pc_system_ovmf_table_find that verifies that the flash
>> was indeed previously parsed (looking for the OVMF table) by
>> pc_system_parse_ovmf_flash.
>>
>> Now pc_system_ovmf_table_find
On 6/30/21 7:46 AM, Dov Murik wrote:
> Add assertion in pc_system_ovmf_table_find that verifies that the flash
> was indeed previously parsed (looking for the OVMF table) by
> pc_system_parse_ovmf_flash.
>
> Now pc_system_ovmf_table_find distinguishes between "no one called
>
Add assertion in pc_system_ovmf_table_find that verifies that the flash
was indeed previously parsed (looking for the OVMF table) by
pc_system_parse_ovmf_flash.
Now pc_system_ovmf_table_find distinguishes between "no one called
pc_system_parse_ovmf_flash" (which will abort due to assertion
