Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
> a Signed-off-by line, and merely link to the kernel documentation.
> The linked kernel docs have a lot of content beyond the part about
> sign-off an thus are misleading/distracting to QEMU contrib
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:33:01PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:22:28PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
> > a Signed-off-by line, and merely link to the kernel documentation.
> > The linked ke
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/05/2024 19.43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 18:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 06:29:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 17:22, Daniel P. Berrangé
On 16/05/2024 19.43, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 18:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 06:29:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 17:22, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
a Si
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 18:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 06:29:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 17:22, Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
> > > a Signed-off-by line,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 06:29:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 17:22, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
> > a Signed-off-by line, and merely link to the kernel documentation.
> > The linked kernel docs ha
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:22:28PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
> a Signed-off-by line, and merely link to the kernel documentation.
> The linked kernel docs have a lot of content beyond the part about
> sign-off an thus are
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 17:22, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
> a Signed-off-by line, and merely link to the kernel documentation.
> The linked kernel docs have a lot of content beyond the part about
> sign-off an thus are misleadi
Currently we have a short paragraph saying that patches must include
a Signed-off-by line, and merely link to the kernel documentation.
The linked kernel docs have a lot of content beyond the part about
sign-off an thus are misleading/distracting to QEMU contributors.
This introduces a dedicated '
