On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 2:54 AM Alexey Baturo wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> Thanks for the lightning fast reply!
> Could you please tell who should bump those numbers and to what values?
Just increment them by 1
> Do you think I could submit this patch series for the review?
Yes, I think so
Alis
From: Alexey Baturo
Zjpm v0.8 is almost frozen and it's much simplier compared to the existing one:
The newer version doesn't allow to specify custom mask or base for masking.
Instead it allows only certain options for masking top bits.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo
---
target/riscv/cpu.c
Hi Alistair,
Thanks for the lightning fast reply!
Could you please tell who should bump those numbers and to what values?
Do you think I could submit this patch series for the review?
Thanks
пн, 18 дек. 2023 г. в 06:11, Alistair Francis :
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alexey Baturo
> wrot
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alexey Baturo wrote:
>
> From: Alexey Baturo
>
> Zjpm v0.8 is almost frozen and it's much simplier compared to the existing
> one:
> The newer version doesn't allow to specify custom mask or base for masking.
> Instead it allows only certain options for masking t
From: Alexey Baturo
Zjpm v0.8 is almost frozen and it's much simplier compared to the existing one:
The newer version doesn't allow to specify custom mask or base for masking.
Instead it allows only certain options for masking top bits.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo
---
target/riscv/cpu.c
