On 8/14/20 2:26 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> +static uint64_t __attribute__((noinline))
>> +pauth_computepac_impdef(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier, ARMPACKey key)
>
> Out of curiosity, why do we need to make these computepac functions
> noinline?
Oh, heh. Left over from profiling. Will remove.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:02:42PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Without hardware acceleration, a cryptographically strong
> algorithm is too expensive for pauth_computepac.
>
> Even with hardware accel, we are not currently expecting
> to link the linux-user binaries to any crypto libraries,
Without hardware acceleration, a cryptographically strong
algorithm is too expensive for pauth_computepac.
Even with hardware accel, we are not currently expecting
to link the linux-user binaries to any crypto libraries,
and doing so would generally make the --static build fail.
So choose XXH64
