On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 19:37:39 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:18:31 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 15:31:42 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:32:53 +0200
> > >
> > > Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On Mittwoch,
On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 19:12:15 CEST Will Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:18 PM Christian Schoenebeck <
>
> qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 15:31:42 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:32:53 +0200
> > >
> > > Christian Schoenebeck
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:18:31 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 15:31:42 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:32:53 +0200
> >
> > Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 12:18:10 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:18 PM Christian Schoenebeck <
qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 15:31:42 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:32:53 +0200
> >
> > Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 12:18:10 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > >
On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 15:31:42 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:32:53 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 12:18:10 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:27:28 +0900
> > >
> > > Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > > On 2022/04/26 21:38,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:32:53 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 12:18:10 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:27:28 +0900
> >
> > Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > On 2022/04/26 21:38, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > [..skip..]
> >
> > > > I think Christian's
On Mittwoch, 27. April 2022 12:18:10 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:27:28 +0900
>
> Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > On 2022/04/26 21:38, Greg Kurz wrote:
> [..skip..]
>
> > > I think Christian's explanation is clear enough. We don't guarantee
> > > that v9fs_co_foo() calls run
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:27:28 +0900
Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2022/04/26 21:38, Greg Kurz wrote:
[..skip..]
> >
> > I think Christian's explanation is clear enough. We don't guarantee
> > that v9fs_co_foo() calls run atomically. As a consequence, the client
> > might see transient states or be
On 2022/04/26 21:38, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:57:37 +0900
Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2022/04/25 3:45, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
+}
+err = chmod(addr.sun_path, mode);
I'm not sure if it is fine to have a time window between bind() and
chmod(). Do you have some
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:57:37 +0900
Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2022/04/25 3:45, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > +}
> > +err = chmod(addr.sun_path, mode);
>
> I'm not sure if it is fine to have a time window between bind() and
> chmod(). Do you have some rationale?
>
On 2022/04/25 3:45, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
+}
+err = chmod(addr.sun_path, mode);
I'm not sure if it is fine to have a time window between bind() and
chmod(). Do you have some rationale?
Good question. QEMU's 9p server is multi-threaded; all 9p requests come in
serialized and
On Samstag, 23. April 2022 06:33:50 CEST Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2022/04/22 23:06, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Freitag, 22. April 2022 04:43:40 CEST Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> >> On 2022/04/22 0:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> >>> mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so
On 2022/04/22 23:06, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
On Freitag, 22. April 2022 04:43:40 CEST Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2022/04/22 0:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so divert to
call sequence socket(), bind() and chmod() respectively if S_IFSOCK
On Freitag, 22. April 2022 04:43:40 CEST Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2022/04/22 0:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so divert to
> > call sequence socket(), bind() and chmod() respectively if S_IFSOCK
> > was passed with mode argument.
> >
> >
On 2022/04/22 0:07, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so divert to
call sequence socket(), bind() and chmod() respectively if S_IFSOCK
was passed with mode argument.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/17933734.zYzKuhC07K@silver/
On Donnerstag, 21. April 2022 18:36:31 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:07:43 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so divert to
> > call sequence socket(), bind() and chmod() respectively if S_IFSOCK
> > was passed with mode
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:07:43 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so divert to
> call sequence socket(), bind() and chmod() respectively if S_IFSOCK
> was passed with mode argument.
>
> Link:
mknod() on macOS does not support creating sockets, so divert to
call sequence socket(), bind() and chmod() respectively if S_IFSOCK
was passed with mode argument.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/17933734.zYzKuhC07K@silver/
Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck
Reviewed-by: Will Cohen
18 matches
Mail list logo
