On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 01/10/2019 10:11, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:41:27AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 01/10/2019 08:47, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:43:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
On 01/10/2019 10:11, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:41:27AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 01/10/2019 08:47, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:43:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 01/10/2019 04:31, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:41:27AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 01/10/2019 08:47, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:43:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 01/10/2019 04:31, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
On 01/10/2019 08:47, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:43:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 01/10/2019 04:31, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 30/09/2019 08:14, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:43:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 01/10/2019 04:31, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 30/09/2019 08:14, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:28:45AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
On 01/10/2019 04:31, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 30/09/2019 08:14, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:28:45AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 30/09/2019 03:49, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 30/09/2019 08:14, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:28:45AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 30/09/2019 03:49, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
On 30/09/2019 08:14, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:28:45AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 30/09/2019 03:49, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:16 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> This
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:28:45AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 30/09/2019 03:49, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:16 +1000
> >> David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >>> This method essentially represents code which
On 27/09/2019 07:50, David Gibson wrote:
> This method essentially represents code which belongs to the interrupt
> controller, but needs to be called on all possible intcs, rather than
> just the currently active one. The "dual" version therefore calls
> into the xics and xive versions
On 30/09/2019 03:49, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:16 +1000
>> David Gibson wrote:
>>
>>> This method essentially represents code which belongs to the interrupt
>>> controller, but needs to be called on all possible
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:16 +1000
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > This method essentially represents code which belongs to the interrupt
> > controller, but needs to be called on all possible intcs, rather than
> > just the currently
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:16 +1000
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > This method essentially represents code which belongs to the interrupt
> > controller, but needs to be called on all possible intcs, rather than
> > just the currently
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:16 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> This method essentially represents code which belongs to the interrupt
> controller, but needs to be called on all possible intcs, rather than
> just the currently active one. The "dual" version therefore calls
> into the xics and xive
This method essentially represents code which belongs to the interrupt
controller, but needs to be called on all possible intcs, rather than
just the currently active one. The "dual" version therefore calls
into the xics and xive versions confusingly.
Handle this more directly, by making it
15 matches
Mail list logo