Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] docs: define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

2024-05-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:11:26PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:22:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > There has been an explosion of interest in so called AI code generators > > in the past year or two. Thus far though, this is has not been matched > > by a

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] docs: define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

2024-05-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:22:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > There has been an explosion of interest in so called AI code generators > in the past year or two. Thus far though, this is has not been matched > by a broadly accepted legal interpretation of the licensing implications > for

[PATCH v2 3/3] docs: define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

2024-05-16 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
There has been an explosion of interest in so called AI code generators in the past year or two. Thus far though, this is has not been matched by a broadly accepted legal interpretation of the licensing implications for code generator outputs. While the vendors may claim there is no problem and a