Apologies, already reviewed, will ping for the merge of the series momentarily,
Claudio
On 8/22/23 14:18, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch would still need a review,
>
> and is needed as a precondition for further work to improve dramatically the
> performance of virsh save, virs
Hello,
this patch would still need a review,
and is needed as a precondition for further work to improve dramatically the
performance of virsh save, virsh restore
when migrating to disk, since Peter Xu already reviewed PATCH 1, 2, 3, maybe it
makes sense to look at 4 too?
Thanks,
Claudio
On
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 03:28:17PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> We don't need to do this in two pieces. One single function makes it
> easier to grasp, specially since it removes the indirection on the
> return value handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu
--
Peter X
We don't need to do this in two pieces. One single function makes it
easier to grasp, specially since it removes the indirection on the
return value handling.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas
---
migration/ram.c | 46 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3
