Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Don't use __bss_start with the "larl" instruction

On 27/06/2023 11.29, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:47:03 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: start.S currently cannot be compiled with Clang 16 and binutils 2.40: ld: start.o(.text+0x8): misaligned symbol `__bss_start' (0xc1e5) for relocation R_390_PC32DBL According to the buil

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Don't use __bss_start with the "larl" instruction

On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 09:47 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > start.S currently cannot be compiled with Clang 16 and binutils 2.40: > >  ld: start.o(.text+0x8): misaligned symbol `__bss_start' (0xc1e5) for > relocation R_390_PC32DBL > > According to the built-in linker script of ld, the symbol __b

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Don't use __bss_start with the "larl" instruction

On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:47:03 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > start.S currently cannot be compiled with Clang 16 and binutils 2.40: > > ld: start.o(.text+0x8): misaligned symbol `__bss_start' (0xc1e5) for > relocation R_390_PC32DBL > > According to the built-in linker script of ld, the symbol _

[PATCH v2 4/4] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Don't use __bss_start with the "larl" instruction

start.S currently cannot be compiled with Clang 16 and binutils 2.40: ld: start.o(.text+0x8): misaligned symbol `__bss_start' (0xc1e5) for relocation R_390_PC32DBL According to the built-in linker script of ld, the symbol __bss_start can actually point *before* the .bss section and does not