Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough devices, so let's let these in. This will allow, for example, ISM devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is available and being used.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c index a39ccfee05..66649af6e0 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c @@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev, pbdev->interp = false; } - if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) { + if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) { error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory " "in the S390 architecture"); return; -- 2.27.0