Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough
devices, so let's let these in.  This will allow, for example, ISM
devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is
available and being used.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
index a39ccfee05..66649af6e0 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler 
*hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
             pbdev->interp = false;
         }
 
-        if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) {
+        if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) {
             error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory "
                        "in the S390 architecture");
             return;
-- 
2.27.0


Reply via email to