On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:39 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
> I'm still not convinced we need a migration back compat for this...
It's absolutely needed,
memory_region_init_ram(isa_bios, NULL, "isa-bios", isa_bios_size,
&error_fatal);
will register a RAM region
On 8/5/24 10:17, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Am 30. April 2024 15:39:21 UTC schrieb "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
:
On 30/4/24 17:06, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
In the -bios case the "isa-bios" memory region is an alias to the BIOS mapped
to the top of the 4G memory boundary. Do the same in the -pflash
Am 30. April 2024 15:39:21 UTC schrieb "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
:
>On 30/4/24 17:06, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>> In the -bios case the "isa-bios" memory region is an alias to the BIOS mapped
>> to the top of the 4G memory boundary. Do the same in the -pflash case, but
>> only
>> for new machine
On 30/4/24 17:06, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
In the -bios case the "isa-bios" memory region is an alias to the BIOS mapped
to the top of the 4G memory boundary. Do the same in the -pflash case, but only
for new machine versions for migration compatibility. This establishes common
behavior and makes
In the -bios case the "isa-bios" memory region is an alias to the BIOS mapped
to the top of the 4G memory boundary. Do the same in the -pflash case, but only
for new machine versions for migration compatibility. This establishes common
behavior and makes pflash commands work in the "isa-bios" regio
