On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:14:53PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> (adding Fabiano to the thread)
>
> On 2/10/23 16:35, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >> Hello Daniel and all,
> >>
> >> resurrecting this series from end of last
(adding Fabiano to the thread)
On 2/10/23 16:35, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> Hello Daniel and all,
>>
>> resurrecting this series from end of last year,
>>
>> do we think that this is the right approach and first step to
>> be
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> Hello Daniel and all,
>
> resurrecting this series from end of last year,
>
> do we think that this is the right approach and first step to
> be able to provide good performance for virsh save and virsh
> restore?
I've looked
Hello Daniel and all,
resurrecting this series from end of last year,
do we think that this is the right approach and first step to be able to
provide good performance for virsh save and virsh restore?
For reference, our previous attempt to get the performance for our use case
(libvirt + qemu
Here's the 3rd version of file-based migration support [0]. For background
check the cover letter of the initial. The main changes are :
- Updated commit message as per Daniel Berrange's suggestino for Patches 1-2
- Fixed tab in various pages
- Added comments better explaining how
