On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:43:10PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi!
> > Here is the updated series of my patches, incorporating all the feedback I
> > received.
> >
> > This implements the API interface that we agreed upon except
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:43:10PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi!
> Here is the updated series of my patches, incorporating all the feedback I
> received.
>
> This implements the API interface that we agreed upon except that I merged the
> LUKSKeyslotActive/LUKSKeyslotInactive union into a st
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200503184324.12506-1-mlevi...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 20200503184324.12506-1-mlevi...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/14] LUKS: encryption slot management
Hi!
Here is the updated series of my patches, incorporating all the feedback I
received.
This implements the API interface that we agreed upon except that I merged the
LUKSKeyslotActive/LUKSKeyslotInactive union into a struct because otherwise
I need nested unions which are not supported currentl
