On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 02:34, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> In several places we use arm_is_secure_below_el3 and
> arm_is_el3_or_mon separately from arm_is_secure.
> These functions make no sense for m-profile, and
> would indicate prior incorrect feature testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henders
On 22/2/23 03:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
In several places we use arm_is_secure_below_el3 and
arm_is_el3_or_mon separately from arm_is_secure.
These functions make no sense for m-profile, and
would indicate prior incorrect feature testing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/arm/cpu
In several places we use arm_is_secure_below_el3 and
arm_is_el3_or_mon separately from arm_is_secure.
These functions make no sense for m-profile, and
would indicate prior incorrect feature testing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),
