Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] s390-ccw: Getting rid of ulong

2023-06-29 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 29/6/23 12:48, Thomas Huth wrote: From: Juan Quintela Any good reason why this still exist? I can understand u* and __u* to be linux kernel like, but ulong? Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Message-Id: <20230510143925.4094-4-quint...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Signed-off-by: Thomas

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] s390-ccw: Getting rid of ulong

2023-06-29 Thread Claudio Imbrenda
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:48:15 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > From: Juan Quintela > > Any good reason why this still exist? > I can understand u* and __u* to be linux kernel like, but ulong? shorter code? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > Message-Id:

[PATCH v3 1/7] s390-ccw: Getting rid of ulong

2023-06-29 Thread Thomas Huth
From: Juan Quintela Any good reason why this still exist? I can understand u* and __u* to be linux kernel like, but ulong? Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Message-Id: <20230510143925.4094-4-quint...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h