On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 19:54 +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 08.12.2020 19:27, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 18:47 +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > > 08.12.2020 17:21, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the fi
08.12.2020 19:27, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 18:47 +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
08.12.2020 17:21, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the file if it was
already created, to avoid leaving stale files around.
We already do this
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 18:47 +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 08.12.2020 17:21, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the file if it was
> > already created, to avoid leaving stale files around.
> >
> > We already do this for luks raw images.
> >
08.12.2020 17:21, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the file if it was
already created, to avoid leaving stale files around.
We already do this for luks raw images.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
---
block/qcow2.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13
On Tue 08 Dec 2020 03:21:59 PM CET, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the file if it was
> already created, to avoid leaving stale files around.
>
> We already do this for luks raw images.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia
>
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 16:26 +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Tue 08 Dec 2020 03:21:59 PM CET, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the file if it was
> > already created, to avoid leaving stale files around.
> >
> > We already do this for luks raw images.
>
If the qcow initialization fails, we should remove the file if it was
already created, to avoid leaving stale files around.
We already do this for luks raw images.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
---
block/qcow2.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/
