On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:03 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 02:24, Max Filippov wrote:
> > I see a few places where target/xtensa may do that. E.g. it does that on
> > entry
> > to an exception handler to allow for debugging its first instruction.
>
> That should now be handl
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 02:24, Max Filippov wrote:
> I see a few places where target/xtensa may do that. E.g. it does that on entry
> to an exception handler to allow for debugging its first instruction.
That should now be handled by the common code, I think (see commits
a7ba744f4082ab and ba3c35d
On 4/14/21 6:23 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
I see a few places where target/xtensa may do that. E.g. it does that on entry
to an exception handler to allow for debugging its first instruction.
No guest code
is consumed to make this decision, would size 1 work in that case?
I'll take a look.
Yes, an
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 18:23 -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:43 PM Richard Henderson
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/14/21 11:03 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:51 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <
> > > i...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 16:48 +0200
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:43 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 4/14/21 11:03 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:51 AM Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> Did you double-check the xtensa issue?
> >>
> >> Oh, I'm sorry,
On 4/14/21 11:03 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:51 AM Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Did you double-check the xtensa issue?
Oh, I'm sorry, I completely forgot about that one. I just ran the
test locally, and apparently i
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:51 AM Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Did you double-check the xtensa issue?
>
> Oh, I'm sorry, I completely forgot about that one. I just ran the
> test locally, and apparently it fails because of this new assert,
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 14.04.21 15:41, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > If arch-specific code generates a translation block of size 0,
> > tb_gen_code() may generate a spurious exception. Add an assertion
> > in
> > order to catch such situations early.
> >
> >
On 14.04.21 15:41, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
If arch-specific code generates a translation block of size 0,
tb_gen_code() may generate a spurious exception. Add an assertion in
order to catch such situations early.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
---
accel/tcg/translate-all.c | 1 +
1 file cha
If arch-specific code generates a translation block of size 0,
tb_gen_code() may generate a spurious exception. Add an assertion in
order to catch such situations early.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
---
accel/tcg/translate-all.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/accel/tcg/tr
10 matches
Mail list logo
