Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-23 Thread Kautuk Consul
On 2023-04-21 14:29:38, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Kautuk Consul writes: > > > Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the > > boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc > > decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on > >

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-21 Thread Alex Bennée
Kautuk Consul writes: > Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the > boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc > decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4@linaro.org/ it > was mentioned that the

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-21 Thread Kautuk Consul
Adding Harsh Prateek Bora. On 2023-04-20 23:23:20, Kautuk Consul wrote: > Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the > boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc > decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on >

[PATCH v4 0/2] Improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-20 Thread Kautuk Consul
Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be