On Thu, 16 May 2024 12:40:19 +0400, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> The aforementioned patch breaks virtio-gpu device migrations for versions
> pre-9.0/9.0, both forwards and backwards. Versioning of `VMS_STRUCT` is more
> complex than it may initially appear, as evidenced in the problematic c
Looks good here, thanks.
On Thu, May 16, 2024, 2:40 a.m. wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Hi,
>
> The aforementioned patch breaks virtio-gpu device migrations for versions
> pre-9.0/9.0, both forwards and backwards. Versioning of `VMS_STRUCT` is
> more
> complex than it may initially appear
Am 16.05.24 um 10:40 schrieb marcandre.lur...@redhat.com:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Hi,
>
> The aforementioned patch breaks virtio-gpu device migrations for versions
> pre-9.0/9.0, both forwards and backwards. Versioning of `VMS_STRUCT` is more
> complex than it may initially appear, as evid
From: Marc-André Lureau
Hi,
The aforementioned patch breaks virtio-gpu device migrations for versions
pre-9.0/9.0, both forwards and backwards. Versioning of `VMS_STRUCT` is more
complex than it may initially appear, as evidenced in the problematic commit
dfcf74fa68c ("virtio-gpu: fix scanout mi
