Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-07-04 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:08:48 +0100 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:30:58 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > > > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : > > > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-07-01 Thread Jonathan Cameron via
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:30:58 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : > > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 > > > Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > > > > Allow -numa without initiat

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-30 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 > > Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > > Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may > > > build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-30 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:40:13 +0200 > Brice Goglin wrote: > > > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : > > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 > > > Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > > >> Allow -numa without initiator value whe

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-30 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:40:13 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 > > Brice Goglin wrote: > > > >> Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may > >> build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes wh

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-30 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote: Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators are not just another single node. patches looks fine cod

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-30 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote: > Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may > build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators > are not just another single node. > patches looks fine code-wise, however something wrong with them, i

[PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-30 Thread Brice Goglin
Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators are not just another single node. changes v3->v4 * use -numa cpu instead of legacy cpus= changes v2->v3: * improve messages for patches 0/4 and 3/4 changes v1->v2: