On Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2020 21:38:16 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:25:35 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2020 20:34:56 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > All existing 9pfs test cases are using the 'synth' fs driver so far,
> > > which
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:25:35 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2020 20:34:56 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > All existing 9pfs test cases are using the 'synth' fs driver so far, which
> > means they are not accessing real files, but a purely simulated (in RAM
>
On Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2020 20:34:56 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> All existing 9pfs test cases are using the 'synth' fs driver so far, which
> means they are not accessing real files, but a purely simulated (in RAM
> only) file system.
>
> Let's make this clear by changing the prefix of
All existing 9pfs test cases are using the 'synth' fs driver so far, which
means they are not accessing real files, but a purely simulated (in RAM
only) file system.
Let's make this clear by changing the prefix of the individual qtest case
names from 'fs/' to 'synth/'. That way they'll be easily
