On 6/22/20 10:37 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/22/20 8:25 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 6/21/20 12:58 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> The current code models the PCA9552, but there are comments
>>> saying the code could be easily adapted for the rest of the
>>> PCA955x family.
On 6/22/20 8:25 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 6/21/20 12:58 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The current code models the PCA9552, but there are comments
>> saying the code could be easily adapted for the rest of the
>> PCA955x family.
>> Since we assume we have at most 16 pins (for the PCA95
On 6/21/20 12:58 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The current code models the PCA9552, but there are comments
> saying the code could be easily adapted for the rest of the
> PCA955x family.
> Since we assume we have at most 16 pins (for the PCA9552),
> add a definition and check the instance doe
The current code models the PCA9552, but there are comments
saying the code could be easily adapted for the rest of the
PCA955x family.
Since we assume we have at most 16 pins (for the PCA9552),
add a definition and check the instance doesn't use more than
this number. This makes the code a bit saf
