[PATCH v4 5/6] hw/cxl: Add poison injection via the mailbox.

2023-03-03 Thread Jonathan Cameron via
Very simple implementation to allow testing of corresponding kernel code. Note that for now we track each 64 byte section independently. Whilst a valid implementation choice, it may make sense to fuse entries so as to prove out more complex corners of the kernel code. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny Sign

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] hw/cxl: Add poison injection via the mailbox.

2023-04-21 Thread Jonathan Cameron via
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 07:27:52 +0100 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 3/3/23 16:09, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Very simple implementation to allow testing of corresponding > > kernel code. Note that for now we track each 64 byte section > > independently. Whilst a valid implementation choice, i

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] hw/cxl: Add poison injection via the mailbox.

2023-03-13 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 3/3/23 16:09, Jonathan Cameron wrote: Very simple implementation to allow testing of corresponding kernel code. Note that for now we track each 64 byte section independently. Whilst a valid implementation choice, it may make sense to fuse entries so as to prove out more complex corners of the

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] hw/cxl: Add poison injection via the mailbox.

2023-03-14 Thread Fan Ni
The 03/03/2023 15:09, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Very simple implementation to allow testing of corresponding > kernel code. Note that for now we track each 64 byte section > independently. Whilst a valid implementation choice, it may > make sense to fuse entries so as to prove out more complex > c