30.03.2021 19:39, Max Reitz wrote:
==
OK, I think now that you didn't mean qcow2_alloc_clusters(). So, we are saying about only
functions returning an offset to cluster with "guest data", not to any kind of
host cluster. Than what you propose looks like this to me:
- take my v5
- rename
30.03.2021 19:39, Max Reitz wrote:
On 30.03.21 15:25, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2021 15:51, Max Reitz wrote:
On 30.03.21 12:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2021 12:49, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.21 20:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ping. Do we want it
On 30.03.21 15:25, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2021 15:51, Max Reitz wrote:
On 30.03.21 12:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2021 12:49, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.21 20:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ping. Do we want it for 6.0?
I’d rather wait. I think
30.03.2021 15:51, Max Reitz wrote:
On 30.03.21 12:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2021 12:49, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.21 20:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ping. Do we want it for 6.0?
I’d rather wait. I think the conclusion was that guests shouldn’t hit this
On 30.03.21 12:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
30.03.2021 12:49, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.21 20:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ping. Do we want it for 6.0?
I’d rather wait. I think the conclusion was that guests shouldn’t hit
this because they serialize discards?
I
30.03.2021 12:49, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.21 20:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ping. Do we want it for 6.0?
I’d rather wait. I think the conclusion was that guests shouldn’t hit this
because they serialize discards?
I think, that we never had bugs, so we of course can wait.
On 25.03.21 20:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ping. Do we want it for 6.0?
I’d rather wait. I think the conclusion was that guests shouldn’t hit
this because they serialize discards?
There’s also something Kevin wrote on IRC a couple of weeks ago, for
which I had hoped he’d sent
ping. Do we want it for 6.0?
19.03.2021 13:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Look at 03 for the problem and fix. 01 is preparation and 02 is the
test.
Actually previous version of this thing is
[PATCH v2(RFC) 0/3] qcow2: fix parallel rewrite and discard
Still
[PATCH v3 0/6]