Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for the RAPL MSRs series

2024-04-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:58 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > However, one question remains unanswered pointing the issue with the > > > location of "/var/local/run/qemu-vmsr-helper.sock", created by > > > compute_default_paths(). QEMU is not allowed to reach the socket here. > > > > If I unders

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for the RAPL MSRs series

2024-04-18 Thread Anthony Harivel
Hi Daniel, Daniel P. Berrangé, Apr 17, 2024 at 19:23: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Anthony Harivel wrote: > > Dear maintainers, > > > > First of all, thank you very much for your review of my patch > > [1]. > > > > In this version (v5), I have attempted to address all the prob

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for the RAPL MSRs series

2024-04-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:57:11PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:14 PM Anthony Harivel wrote: > > > > Dear maintainers, > > > > First of all, thank you very much for your review of my patch > > [1]. > > > > In this version (v5), I have attempted to address all the problem

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for the RAPL MSRs series

2024-04-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Anthony Harivel wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > First of all, thank you very much for your review of my patch > [1]. > > In this version (v5), I have attempted to address all the problems > addressed by Daniel during the last review. I've been more care

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for the RAPL MSRs series

2024-04-12 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:14 PM Anthony Harivel wrote: > > Dear maintainers, > > First of all, thank you very much for your review of my patch > [1]. > > In this version (v5), I have attempted to address all the problems > addressed by Daniel during the last review. I've been more careful with > a

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for the RAPL MSRs series

2024-04-11 Thread Anthony Harivel
Dear maintainers, First of all, thank you very much for your review of my patch [1]. In this version (v5), I have attempted to address all the problems addressed by Daniel during the last review. I've been more careful with all the remarks made. However, one question remains unanswered poin