On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 07:49, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Gerd, Peter, what do you think about accepting this patch series? The
> only possibly disruptive patch is #5, which modifies the dev-storage.c
> code a bit, the rest is all new code which shouldn't affect anything
> else. Felippe Mathieu-Daud
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 13:22, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:48:53PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > Gerd, Peter, what do you think about accepting this patch series? The
> > only possibly disruptive patch is #5, which modifies the dev-storage.c
> > code a bit, the rest is al
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:48:53PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Gerd, Peter, what do you think about accepting this patch series? The
> only possibly disruptive patch is #5, which modifies the dev-storage.c
> code a bit, the rest is all new code which shouldn't affect anything
> else. Felippe Mat
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200512064900.28554-1-pauld...@gmail.com/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 20200512064900.28554-1-pauld...@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/7] dwc-hsotg (aka dwc2) USB host
Gerd, Peter, what do you think about accepting this patch series? The
only possibly disruptive patch is #5, which modifies the dev-storage.c
code a bit, the rest is all new code which shouldn't affect anything
else. Felippe Mathieu-Daudé has done quite a bit of review of the
patches, and has said h
