On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:09:47 +0100
Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 2/27/20 8:53 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> > On 2/26/20 6:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:27:52 +0100
> >> David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Lets make it a bit
On 2/27/20 8:53 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 2/26/20 6:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:27:52 +0100
>> David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>>> On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
>>
>> s/Lets/Let's/ :)
>
On 2/26/20 6:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:27:52 +0100
> David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>> On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
>
> s/Lets/Let's/ :)
Ack
>
>>> from the short psw.
>>>
>>> Signed-of
On 26.02.20 18:51, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:27:52 +0100
> David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>> On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
>
> s/Lets/Let's/ :)
>
>>> from the short psw.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: J
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:27:52 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> > Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
s/Lets/Let's/ :)
> > from the short psw.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
> > ---
> > hw/s390x/ipl.c | 2 +-
On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
> from the short psw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
> ---
> hw/s390x/ipl.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
On 2/26/20 2:46 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
>> from the short psw.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
>
>
>
> PSW_MASK_ESA_MASK and PSW_MASK_ESA_ADDR look pretty simila
On 26.02.20 13:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
> from the short psw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
PSW_MASK_ESA_MASK and PSW_MASK_ESA_ADDR look pretty similar, but I cant find
a good name. We could use ~PSW_MASK_ESA_ADDR a
Lets make it a bit more clear that we're extracting the 31 bit address
from the short psw.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
---
hw/s390x/ipl.c | 2 +-
target/s390x/cpu.c | 4 ++--
target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/i