On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 07:35:28AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
We ask patch submitters to cc: subject matter experts for review. You
did. When such patches touch the QAPI schema, it's best to cc the qapi
schema maintainers (Eric Blake and me) as well, because we can't require
all subject ma
We ask patch submitters to cc: subject matter experts for review. You
did. When such patches touch the QAPI schema, it's best to cc the qapi
schema maintainers (Eric Blake and me) as well, because we can't require
all subject matter experts to be fluent in the QAPI schema language and
conventions
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 06:32:45PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Jens Freimann (jfreim...@redhat.com) wrote:
This event is sent to let libvirt know that VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY
feature was not negotiated during virtio feature negotiation. If this
event is received it means any primary devi
* Jens Freimann (jfreim...@redhat.com) wrote:
> This event is sent to let libvirt know that VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY
> feature was not negotiated during virtio feature negotiation. If this
> event is received it means any primary devices hotplugged before
> this were were never really added to QEMU dev
This event is sent to let libvirt know that VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY
feature was not negotiated during virtio feature negotiation. If this
event is received it means any primary devices hotplugged before
this were were never really added to QEMU devices.
Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann
---
qapi/net.jso
