On Thu, 12 May 2022 17:05:41 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2022 at 16:59, Eric Auger wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On 5/12/22 15:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:52, Eric Auger wrote:
> > >> The tests themselves are the same as the ISA device ones.
>
On Thu, 12 May 2022 at 16:59, Eric Auger wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 5/12/22 15:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:52, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> The tests themselves are the same as the ISA device ones.
> >> Only the main() changes as the "tpm-tis-device" device gets
> >>
Hi Peter,
On 5/12/22 15:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:52, Eric Auger wrote:
>> The tests themselves are the same as the ISA device ones.
>> Only the main() changes as the "tpm-tis-device" device gets
>> instantiated. Also the base address of the device is not
>> 0xFED4
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:52, Eric Auger wrote:
>
> The tests themselves are the same as the ISA device ones.
> Only the main() changes as the "tpm-tis-device" device gets
> instantiated. Also the base address of the device is not
> 0xFED4 anymore but matches the base address of the
> ARM virt
The tests themselves are the same as the ISA device ones.
Only the main() changes as the "tpm-tis-device" device gets
instantiated. Also the base address of the device is not
0xFED4 anymore but matches the base address of the
ARM virt platform bus.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
Reviewed-by:
