On 10/8/20 3:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eduardo Habkost writes:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:08:33PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
On 10/7/20 4:50 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
Code style tools really dislike the use of global keywords, because it
generally involves re-bindi
Eduardo Habkost writes:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:08:33PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>> On 10/7/20 4:50 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> > John Snow writes:
>> >
>> > > Code style tools really dislike the use of global keywords, because it
>> > > generally involves re-binding the name at runtime
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:08:33PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On 10/7/20 4:50 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > John Snow writes:
> >
> > > Code style tools really dislike the use of global keywords, because it
> > > generally involves re-binding the name at runtime which can have strange
> > > eff
On 10/7/20 4:50 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
Code style tools really dislike the use of global keywords, because it
generally involves re-binding the name at runtime which can have strange
effects depending on when and how that global name is referenced in
other modules.
Mak
John Snow writes:
> Code style tools really dislike the use of global keywords, because it
> generally involves re-binding the name at runtime which can have strange
> effects depending on when and how that global name is referenced in
> other modules.
>
> Make a little indent level manager inste
Code style tools really dislike the use of global keywords, because it
generally involves re-binding the name at runtime which can have strange
effects depending on when and how that global name is referenced in
other modules.
Make a little indent level manager instead.
Signed-off-by: John Snow