> On Mar 3, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 03/03/20 09:05, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>>
>>> Paolo, would you queue it?
>> Ping: did this get lost?
>
> Yes, I have queued it now and fixed the conflicts.
>
> Paolo
>
Thanks! Sorry for conflicts, I should have pinged sooner.
F.
On 03/03/20 09:05, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>> Paolo, would you queue it?
> Ping: did this get lost?
Yes, I have queued it now and fixed the conflicts.
Paolo
Hi Marc/Paolo,
> On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:16 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>> This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by
>> enabling
>> a default getter/setter only when desired. To prevent an API b
Hi
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:16 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by enabling
> a default getter/setter only when desired. To prevent an API behavioural
> change
> (from clients that already used these helpers and did not want a sett
This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by enabling
a default getter/setter only when desired. To prevent an API behavioural change
(from clients that already used these helpers and did not want a setter), we
add a OBJ_PROP_FLAG_READ flag that allow clients to only have a
