Re: [PATCH v6 00/42] nvme: support NVMe v1.3d, SGLs and multiple namespaces

2020-03-25 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:28 -0700, Klaus Jensen wrote: > From: Klaus Jensen > > Hi, > > So this patchset kinda blew up in size (wrt. number of patches) after > Maxim's comments (26 -> 42), but Maxim's comments about splitting up a > bunch of the patches made a lot of sense. I don't think this is

Re: [PATCH v6 00/42] nvme: support NVMe v1.3d, SGLs and multiple namespaces

2020-03-16 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200316142928.153431-1-...@irrelevant.dk/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [PATCH v6 00/42] nvme: support NVMe v1.3d, SGLs and multiple namespaces Message-id: 20200316142928.153431

[PATCH v6 00/42] nvme: support NVMe v1.3d, SGLs and multiple namespaces

2020-03-16 Thread Klaus Jensen
From: Klaus Jensen Hi, So this patchset kinda blew up in size (wrt. number of patches) after Maxim's comments (26 -> 42), but Maxim's comments about splitting up a bunch of the patches made a lot of sense. v6 primarily splits up the big nasty patches into more digestible parts. Specifically the