John Snow writes:
> On 2/16/21 3:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> It does happen to be a list (as of now), but we can describe it in more
>>> general terms with no loss in accuracy to allow tuples and other
>>> constructs.
>>>
>>> In the future, we can write "ifcond:
On 2/16/21 3:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
It does happen to be a list (as of now), but we can describe it in more
general terms with no loss in accuracy to allow tuples and other
constructs.
In the future, we can write "ifcond: Sequence[str] = ()" as a default
parameter,
John Snow writes:
> It does happen to be a list (as of now), but we can describe it in more
> general terms with no loss in accuracy to allow tuples and other
> constructs.
>
> In the future, we can write "ifcond: Sequence[str] = ()" as a default
> parameter, which we could not do with a Mutable
It does happen to be a list (as of now), but we can describe it in more
general terms with no loss in accuracy to allow tuples and other
constructs.
In the future, we can write "ifcond: Sequence[str] = ()" as a default
parameter, which we could not do with a Mutable type like a List.