On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 12:52:22PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 05:36:15PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > On 29.08.23 20:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > Upcoming additions to support NBD 64-bit effect lengths allow for the
> > > possibility to distinguish between p
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 05:36:15PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 29.08.23 20:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Upcoming additions to support NBD 64-bit effect lengths allow for the
> > possibility to distinguish between payload length (capped at 32M) and
> > effect length (64 bits, althou
On 29.08.23 20:58, Eric Blake wrote:
Upcoming additions to support NBD 64-bit effect lengths allow for the
possibility to distinguish between payload length (capped at 32M) and
effect length (64 bits, although we generally assume 63 bits because
of off_t limitations). Without that extension, onl
Upcoming additions to support NBD 64-bit effect lengths allow for the
possibility to distinguish between payload length (capped at 32M) and
effect length (64 bits, although we generally assume 63 bits because
of off_t limitations). Without that extension, only the NBD_CMD_WRITE
request has a paylo
