Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Juan Quintela
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> >> "manish.mishra" wrote: > >> >

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Juan Quintela
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> "manish.mishra" wrote: >> >> > MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and >> >>

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> "manish.mishra" wrote: > >> > MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and > >> > the next read shall still return

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Juan Quintela
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> "manish.mishra" wrote: >> > MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and >> > the next read shall still return this data. This support is >> > currently added only for socket class. E

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > "manish.mishra" wrote: > > MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and > > the next read shall still return this data. This support is > > currently added only for socket class. Extra parameter 'flags' > > is add

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-02 Thread Juan Quintela
"manish.mishra" wrote: > MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and > the next read shall still return this data. This support is > currently added only for socket class. Extra parameter 'flags' > is added to io_readv calls to pass extra read flags like MSG_PEEK. > > Reviewed

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2023-02-01 Thread Juan Quintela
"manish.mishra" wrote: > MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and > the next read shall still return this data. This support is > currently added only for socket class. Extra parameter 'flags' > is added to io_readv calls to pass extra read flags like MSG_PEEK. > > Reviewed

[PATCH v6 1/2] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel

2022-12-20 Thread manish.mishra
MSG_PEEK peeks at the channel, The data is treated as unread and the next read shall still return this data. This support is currently added only for socket class. Extra parameter 'flags' is added to io_readv calls to pass extra read flags like MSG_PEEK. Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Daniel