Hi Xiaoyao,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:19:34AM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:19:34 +0800
> From: Xiaoyao Li
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/16] i386: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with
> specific topology level
>
> On 1/8/2024 4:27 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
Hi Xiaoyao,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:19:34AM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:19:34 +0800
> From: Xiaoyao Li
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/16] i386: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with
> specific topology level
>
> On 1/8/2024 4:27 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
On 1/8/2024 4:27 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
From: Zhao Liu
At present, the subleaf 0x02 of CPUID[0x1F] is bound to the "die" level.
In fact, the specific topology level exposed in 0x1F depends on the
platform's support for extension levels (module, tile and die).
To help expose "module" level in
From: Zhao Liu
At present, the subleaf 0x02 of CPUID[0x1F] is bound to the "die" level.
In fact, the specific topology level exposed in 0x1F depends on the
platform's support for extension levels (module, tile and die).
To help expose "module" level in 0x1F, decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf
with
