On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 10:12:27AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> On 11/30/21 20:52, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 07:24:04PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
[snip]
> > > > > +static bool pmu_increment_insns(CPUPPCState *env, uint32_t num_insns)
> > > > > +{
> > > >
On 11/30/21 20:52, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 07:24:04PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 11/29/21 01:36, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:08:13PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The PMU is already counting cycles by calculating time elapsed in
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 07:24:04PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/21 01:36, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:08:13PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > > The PMU is already counting cycles by calculating time elapsed in
> > > nanoseconds. Counting in
On 11/29/21 01:36, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:08:13PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The PMU is already counting cycles by calculating time elapsed in
nanoseconds. Counting instructions is a different matter and requires
another approach.
This patch adds the capabi
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:08:13PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The PMU is already counting cycles by calculating time elapsed in
> nanoseconds. Counting instructions is a different matter and requires
> another approach.
>
> This patch adds the capability of counting completed instruct
The PMU is already counting cycles by calculating time elapsed in
nanoseconds. Counting instructions is a different matter and requires
another approach.
This patch adds the capability of counting completed instructions
(Perf event PM_INST_CMPL) by counting the amount of instructions
translated in
