Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-09-18 Thread Coiby Xu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:35:57PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: v9 - move logical block size check function to a utility function - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. Hi, Any update on v10? Please

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-09-15 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > v9 > - move logical block size check function to a utility function > - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. Hi, Any update on v10? Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Stefan sig

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-08-18 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > v9 > - move logical block size check function to a utility function > - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. Great to see you are back, Coiby! Looking forward to reviewing v10. Stefan signature.asc De

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-08-17 Thread Coiby Xu
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:28:44AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:52:16PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ > > > > Hi, > > Th

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-26 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:46:56PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:07:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > > > v9 > > > - move logical block size check function to a utility function > > > - fix issues regarding lic

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-25 Thread Coiby Xu
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:07:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: v9 - move logical block size check function to a utility function - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. I have replied with patches tha

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-23 Thread Coiby Xu
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:07:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: v9 - move logical block size check function to a utility function - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. I have replied with patches tha

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-23 Thread Coiby Xu
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:27:48AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:52:16PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ > > > > Hi, > > Th

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-19 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:39:02AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > v9 > - move logical block size check function to a utility function > - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. I have replied with patches that you can consider squashing into your series. I was testing th

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-18 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:52:16PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > > Patchew URL: > > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > This series failed the asan build test. Please

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-18 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:52:16PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > > Patchew URL: > > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > This series failed the asan build test. Please

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-16 Thread Coiby Xu
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ Hi, This series failed the asan build test. Please find the testing commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can p

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-14 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ Hi, This series failed the asan build test. Please find the testing commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it locally. === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash exp

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-14 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200614183907.514282-1-coiby...@gmail.com/ Hi, This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find the testing commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it locally. === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ==

[PATCH v9 0/5] vhost-user block device backend implementation

2020-06-14 Thread Coiby Xu
v9 - move logical block size check function to a utility function - fix issues regarding license, coding style, memory deallocation, etc. v8 - re-try connecting to socket server to fix asan error - fix license naming issue v7 - fix docker-test-debug@fedora errors by freeing malloced memory