[PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-25 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
v9: 01: new, one more whitespace-fixing patch testenv: allow case when we don't have system-arch emulator, but have several for another architectures change direct os.access(..., os.X_OK) calls to new helper function which also check that path is a file testrunner: s/fail/not run/ for 'N

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 25.01.2021 um 19:50 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > v9: > 01: new, one more whitespace-fixing patch > testenv: allow case when we don't have system-arch emulator, but have several > for another architectures > change direct os.access(..., os.X_OK) calls to new helper fu

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
26.01.2021 15:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 25.01.2021 um 19:50 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: v9: 01: new, one more whitespace-fixing patch testenv: allow case when we don't have system-arch emulator, but have several for another architectures change direct os.access(..., o

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 26.01.2021 um 14:19 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > 26.01.2021 15:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 25.01.2021 um 19:50 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > > > v9: > > > 01: new, one more whitespace-fixing patch > > > testenv: allow case when we don't have system-arch emul

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 26.01.2021 um 14:19 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > 26.01.2021 15:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 25.01.2021 um 19:50 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > > > v9: > > > 01: new, one more whitespace-fixing patch > > > testenv: allow case when we don't have system-arch emul

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
26.01.2021 18:07, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 26.01.2021 um 14:19 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: 26.01.2021 15:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 25.01.2021 um 19:50 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: v9: 01: new, one more whitespace-fixing patch testenv: allow case when we don't have

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 26.01.2021 um 16:15 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > OK, thanks for handling it! You're welcome. Only problem now: Max sent a conflicting pull request that touches 'group'. He suggested that we could split the deletion of 'group' from the 'check' rewrite and merge it only later

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-01-26 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
26.01.2021 18:36, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 26.01.2021 um 16:15 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: OK, thanks for handling it! You're welcome. Only problem now: Max sent a conflicting pull request that touches 'group'. He suggested that we could split the deletion of 'group' from the 'c

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-02-15 Thread John Snow
On 1/26/21 10:15 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: OK, thanks for handling it! When will we move to python 3.7? "I don't know, but it seems like a very long time." The nominal EOL for Python 3.6 is this December; see https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/ Debian 10 ships 3.7. F

Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Rework iotests/check

2021-02-16 Thread Thomas Huth
On 16/02/2021 02.49, John Snow wrote: On 1/26/21 10:15 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: OK, thanks for handling it! When will we move to python 3.7? [...] As for RHEL/CentOS, I think it's in the same shape right now. It's 3.6-based, but I don't know if there's an optional 3.7+ packa