On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 02:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> Thanks, but then this is pretty sad. I'm surprised aarch64 doesn't have
> such requirement to allow some VM config to run across all kinds of hosts.
It just hasn't been anything that anybody so far has wanted
enough to put the necessary kernel-side
Hi,
On 2/2/24 11:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 23:50, Peter Xu wrote:
>> Fabiano, I think you forgot to reply-to-all.. adding back the list and
>> people in the loop.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:12:44AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> Peter Xu writes:
>>>
On Wed, Jan
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:51:36AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 23:50, Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > Fabiano, I think you forgot to reply-to-all.. adding back the list and
> > people in the loop.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:12:44AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > > Peter Xu
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 23:50, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> Fabiano, I think you forgot to reply-to-all.. adding back the list and
> people in the loop.
>
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:12:44AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > Peter Xu writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:09:16AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas w
Fabiano, I think you forgot to reply-to-all.. adding back the list and
people in the loop.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:12:44AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:09:16AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >> If we ask for KVM and it falls back to TCG, we ne
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:09:16AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> If we ask for KVM and it falls back to TCG, we need a cpu that supports
> both. We don't have that. I've put some command-line combinations at the
> end of the email[1], take a look.
Thanks a lot, Fabiano. I think I have a better pi
Peter Xu writes:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:23:10PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Xu writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:18:07AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 23:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Fabiano Rosas writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Peter X
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:23:10PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:18:07AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 23:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Fabiano Rosas writes:
> >> >
> >> > > Peter Xu writes:
> >> > >
> >> > >>
Peter Xu writes:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:18:07AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 23:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >
>> > Fabiano Rosas writes:
>> >
>> > > Peter Xu writes:
>> > >
>> > >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> > > The issue th
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:18:07AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 23:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >
> > Fabiano Rosas writes:
> >
> > > Peter Xu writes:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > > The issue that occurs to me now is that '
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 23:31, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>
> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>
> > Peter Xu writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > The issue that occurs to me now is that 'cpu host' will not work with
> > TCG. We might actually need to go poking /dev/
Fabiano Rosas writes:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
>>> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:36, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> pet...@redhat.com writes:
>>> >>
>>> >> > From: Fabiano Rosas
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Th
Peter Xu writes:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:36, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >>
>> >> pet...@redhat.com writes:
>> >>
>> >> > From: Fabiano Rosas
>> >> >
>> >> > The 'max' cpu is not expected to be sta
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:36, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >>
> >> pet...@redhat.com writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Fabiano Rosas
> >> >
> >> > The 'max' cpu is not expected to be stable in terms of features acros
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:36, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>
>> pet...@redhat.com writes:
>>
>> > From: Fabiano Rosas
>> >
>> > The 'max' cpu is not expected to be stable in terms of features across
>> > QEMU versions, so it should not be expected to migrate.
>> >
>> > While th
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:36, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>
> pet...@redhat.com writes:
>
> > From: Fabiano Rosas
> >
> > The 'max' cpu is not expected to be stable in terms of features across
> > QEMU versions, so it should not be expected to migrate.
> >
> > While the tests currently all pass with -cp
pet...@redhat.com writes:
> From: Fabiano Rosas
>
> The 'max' cpu is not expected to be stable in terms of features across
> QEMU versions, so it should not be expected to migrate.
>
> While the tests currently all pass with -cpu max, that is only because
> we're not testing across QEMU versions,
From: Fabiano Rosas
The 'max' cpu is not expected to be stable in terms of features across
QEMU versions, so it should not be expected to migrate.
While the tests currently all pass with -cpu max, that is only because
we're not testing across QEMU versions, which is the more common
use-case for
18 matches
Mail list logo
