From: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> The virtual hypervisor currently always intercepts and handles hypercalls but with a future change this will not always be the case.
Add a helper for the test so the logic is abstracted from the mechanism. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-7-npig...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> --- target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c index fcc83a77015f..6b6ec71bc22a 100644 --- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c @@ -1278,6 +1278,18 @@ static void powerpc_excp_booke(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) } #ifdef TARGET_PPC64 +/* + * When running under vhyp, hcalls are always intercepted and sent to the + * vhc->hypercall handler. + */ +static bool books_vhyp_handles_hcall(PowerPCCPU *cpu) +{ + if (cpu->vhyp) { + return true; + } + return false; +} + static void powerpc_excp_books(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) { CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); @@ -1439,7 +1451,7 @@ static void powerpc_excp_books(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) env->nip += 4; /* "PAPR mode" built-in hypercall emulation */ - if ((lev == 1) && cpu->vhyp) { + if ((lev == 1) && books_vhyp_handles_hcall(cpu)) { PPCVirtualHypervisorClass *vhc = PPC_VIRTUAL_HYPERVISOR_GET_CLASS(cpu->vhyp); vhc->hypercall(cpu->vhyp, cpu); -- 2.34.1