[PULL 7/9] linux-user: Don't require PROT_READ for mincore

2023-05-17 Thread Laurent Vivier
From: Thomas Weißschuh The kernel does not require PROT_READ for addresses passed to mincore. For example the fincore(1) tool from util-linux uses PROT_NONE and currently does not work under qemu-user. Example (with fincore(1) from util-linux 2.38): $ fincore /proc/self/exe RES PAGES SIZE

[PULL 7/9] linux-user: Don't require PROT_READ for mincore

2023-05-16 Thread Laurent Vivier
From: Thomas Weißschuh The kernel does not require PROT_READ for addresses passed to mincore. For example the fincore(1) tool from util-linux uses PROT_NONE and currently does not work under qemu-user. Example (with fincore(1) from util-linux 2.38): $ fincore /proc/self/exe RES PAGES SIZE

[PULL 7/9] linux-user: Don't require PROT_READ for mincore

2023-05-15 Thread Laurent Vivier
From: Thomas Weißschuh The kernel does not require PROT_READ for addresses passed to mincore. For example the fincore(1) tool from util-linux uses PROT_NONE and currently does not work under qemu-user. Example (with fincore(1) from util-linux 2.38): $ fincore /proc/self/exe RES PAGES SIZE

[PULL 7/9] linux-user: Don't require PROT_READ for mincore

2023-05-12 Thread Laurent Vivier
From: Thomas Weißschuh The kernel does not require PROT_READ for addresses passed to mincore. For example the fincore(1) tool from util-linux uses PROT_NONE and currently does not work under qemu-user. Example (with fincore(1) from util-linux 2.38): $ fincore /proc/self/exe RES PAGES SIZE