On 08/27/15 19:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:27:00PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 06/09/15 16:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 06/09/15 11:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:27:00PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/09/15 16:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 06/09/15 11:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>
On 06/09/15 16:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 06/09/15 11:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/09/15 11:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
> >>
> >> Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 su
On 06/09/15 11:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
>>
>> Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the
>> ACPI 2.0 bits via LoadTable? Hopefully
On 06/09/15 10:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 06/09/15 08:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:35:38AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
>
> Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the ACPI
> 2.0 bits via LoadTable? Hopefully XP does not BSOD if the invalid (for ACPI
> 1.0)
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:35:38 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
> >
> > Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the
> > ACPI 2.0 bits v
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
>
> Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the ACPI
> 2.0 bits via LoadTable? Hopefully XP does not BSOD if the invalid (for ACPI
> 1.0)
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/09/15 08:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:35:38AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT i
On 06/09/15 08:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:35:38AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:35:38AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
> >
> > Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the
> > ACPI 2.0 bi
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:02:31AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
>
> Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the ACPI
> 2.0 bits via LoadTable? Hopefully XP does not BSOD if the invalid (for ACPI
> 1.0)
I would just patch OVMF to ignore the RSDT if there is an XSDT.
Alternatively, can you check for ACPI 2.0 support via _OSI, and load the ACPI
2.0 bits via LoadTable? Hopefully XP does not BSOD if the invalid (for ACPI
1.0) opcodes are in a Then block or in a separate method... Then you can use
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 02:08:03AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/08/15 20:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > XSDT support allows using ACPI 2 features while
> > avoiding breaking legacy windows XP guests:
> > ACPI 2 tables are linked from XSDT only,
> > ACPI 1 tables from both RSDT and XSDT, th
On 06/08/15 20:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> XSDT support allows using ACPI 2 features while
> avoiding breaking legacy windows XP guests:
> ACPI 2 tables are linked from XSDT only,
> ACPI 1 tables from both RSDT and XSDT, this way
> XP does not see ACPI 2 tables.
>
> As a first step, this patch
XSDT support allows using ACPI 2 features while
avoiding breaking legacy windows XP guests:
ACPI 2 tables are linked from XSDT only,
ACPI 1 tables from both RSDT and XSDT, this way
XP does not see ACPI 2 tables.
As a first step, this patchset generates v2 RSDP
and fills in XSDT matching RSDT exact
17 matches
Mail list logo