On 27 January 2012 00:33, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Anyway, if we would otherwise die horribly later on we should
>> catch these cases, but it would be good to have at least a comment
>> saying that these are implementation limitations rather than
>> architectural ones.
>
> Go
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:09:41 +, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 24 January 2012 08:42, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Reading through this, I see a lot of "- 32". Trivial patch follows,
> > which applies to your rebasing branch:
>
> (If you send patches as fresh new emails then they just apply
> with
On 24 January 2012 08:42, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:52:39 +, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> From: Mark Langsdorf
>>
>> Increase the maximum number of GIC interrupts for a9mp and a11mp to 1020,
>> and create a configurable property for each defaulting to 96 and 64
>> (respecti
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:52:39 +, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> From: Mark Langsdorf
>
> Increase the maximum number of GIC interrupts for a9mp and a11mp to 1020,
> and create a configurable property for each defaulting to 96 and 64
> (respectively) so that device modelers can set the value appropri
