As far as I can see, the fix has been included here:
http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=beb526b12134a6b674
... so closing this ticket now.
** Changed in: qemu
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is
I just submitted a patch to the dev mailing list. Just in case there is
an issue with the submitted patch, or if Erik wants it sooner, I
attached the patch I submitted.
** Patch added: "0001-Change-to-correct-PowerPC-on-64bit-host.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1052857/+attachment
On 1 January 2013 06:56, Samuel Seay wrote:
> I ran into this issue also and did a bit of investigating. This is only
> an issue when ran on a 64bit host. The actual problem line is
>
> err |= __put_user(h2g(ka->_sa_handler), &sc->handler);
>
> inside of linux_user/signal.c. What I am unsure of is
** Summary changed:
- qemu-user compiled static for ppc fails
+ qemu-user compiled static for ppc fails on 64bit hosts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052857
Title:
qemu-user compil
I ran into this issue also and did a bit of investigating. This is only
an issue when ran on a 64bit host. The actual problem line is
err |= __put_user(h2g(ka->_sa_handler), &sc->handler);
inside of linux_user/signal.c. What I am unsure of is when the h2g()
macro, the cause of the assert, is vali
