The fix had been included here:
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=e1f7b4812eab992de46c98b
... so closing this bug now.
** Changed in: qemu
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEM
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:42:50PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) 01 Nov 2012 [14:04:11], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:49:18PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Tue) 23 Oct 2012 [14:55:03], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:50:00AM -0700, Ediv
On (Thu) 01 Nov 2012 [14:04:11], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:49:18PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Tue) 23 Oct 2012 [14:55:03], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:50:00AM -0700, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira
> > > wrote:
> > > > I didn't take enough t
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:49:18PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Tue) 23 Oct 2012 [14:55:03], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:50:00AM -0700, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira wrote:
> > > I didn't take enough time to uderstand the code, so unfortunately I fear
> > > there is not muc
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:46:06PM -, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thank you, very much for taking the time to help me, and excuse me for
> not seeing your answer early...
>
> I've run the procedure you pointed me out, and the result is:
>
> 0d8d7690850eb0cf2b2b60933cf4
On (Tue) 23 Oct 2012 [14:55:03], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:50:00AM -0700, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira wrote:
> > I didn't take enough time to uderstand the code, so unfortunately I fear
> > there is not much I could do to solve the problem, apart from trying your
> > sugg
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:50:00AM -0700, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira wrote:
> I didn't take enough time to uderstand the code, so unfortunately I fear
> there is not much I could do to solve the problem, apart from trying your
> suggestions. But I'll try to spend a little more time on it, until w
De: Amit Shah
> Assunto: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1066055] Re: Network performance regression
> with vde_switch
> Para: "Stefan Hajnoczi"
> Cc: "Bug 1066055" <1066...@bugs.launchpad.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
> edivaldoapere...@yahoo.com.br
> Data: Seg
On (Tue) 16 Oct 2012 [09:48:09], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:46:06PM -, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > Thank you, very much for taking the time to help me, and excuse me for
> > not seeing your answer early...
> >
> > I've run the procedure yo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira
wrote:
> Hi Stefan
>
> I finally could revert that commit in the latest snapshot; problem was I
> needed to revert one later, that modified hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
> accordingly; after that reversion, the regression in network performance
Hi Stefan
I finally could revert that commit in the latest snapshot; problem was I
needed to revert one later, that modified hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
accordingly; after that reversion, the regression in network performance
went completely away; this confirms my previous identification of the
commit
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:46:06PM -, Edivaldo de Araujo Pereira wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thank you, very much for taking the time to help me, and excuse me for
> not seeing your answer early...
>
> I've run the procedure you pointed me out, and the result is:
>
> 0d8d7690850eb0cf2b2b60933cf4
Hi Stefan,
Thank you, very much for taking the time to help me, and excuse me for
not seeing your answer early...
I've run the procedure you pointed me out, and the result is:
0d8d7690850eb0cf2b2b60933cf47669a6b6f18f is the first bad commit
commit 0d8d7690850eb0cf2b2b60933cf47669a6b6f18f
Author:
13 matches
Mail list logo
