Peter Maydell writes:
On 25 March 2013 14:06, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> Still qemu-system-mips64, qemu-system-mips64el, and qemu-system-arm
> give spurious errors.
If you can provide a reasonably sized test case for
qemu-system-arm I can investigate that one.
I don't know how to
On 25 March 2013 14:06, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> Still qemu-system-mips64, qemu-system-mips64el, and qemu-system-arm
> give spurious errors.
If you can provide a reasonably sized test case for
qemu-system-arm I can investigate that one.
thanks
-- PMM
After the latest patch of Richard's, qemu-system-x86_64 now runs
GNU/Linux properly. The denorm problem is gone, and there seem to be no
(or at least much fewer) spurious segfaults.
This ends a multi-month period of qemu-system-x86_64 instability.
Still qemu-system-mips64, qemu-system-mips64el,
Richard Henderson writes:
Patch at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/229139/
Thanks. I can confirm that this fixes the bug triggered by my test case
(and yours). However, the instability of Debian GNU/Linux x86_64 has
not improved.
The exact same Debian version (debian "testing") updated
On 03/17/2013 12:34 PM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> The current qemu sources cause improper handling of flags on x86-64.
> This bug seems to have shown up a few weeks ago.
>
> A plain install of Debian GNU/Linux makes user processes catch
> spurious signals. The kernel se
Public bug reported:
The current qemu sources cause improper handling of flags on x86-64.
This bug seems to have shown up a few weeks ago.
A plain install of Debian GNU/Linux makes user processes catch
spurious signals. The kernel seems to run stably, though.
The ADX feature works very poorly.
