scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
the number ("4096xyz" was accepted before).
Signed-off-by: Kevin
On 06/18/2010 09:27 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
> corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
> scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
> the number ("409
Kevin Wolf writes:
> scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
> corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
> scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
> the number ("4096xyz" was accepted be
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:27:03PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
> corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
> scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
On 06/18/2010 11:27 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
the number ("4096xyz"
