> Contrary to Paul's argument QEMU does not only support a fixed
> set of known host architectures, but also unknown hosts (via TCI).
> For those, there remains a small chance that they are big endian
> and that they get the wrong endianness now. TCI is still experimental,
> so I don't care too muc
Am 14.03.2012 22:37, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 14 March 2012 21:24, Stefan Weil wrote:
Contrary to Paul's argument QEMU does not only support a fixed
set of known host architectures, but also unknown hosts (via TCI).
For those, there remains a small chance that they are big endian
and that they
On 14 March 2012 21:24, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Contrary to Paul's argument QEMU does not only support a fixed
> set of known host architectures, but also unknown hosts (via TCI).
> For those, there remains a small chance that they are big endian
> and that they get the wrong endianness now. TCI is s
Am 14.03.2012 21:37, schrieb Stuart Yoder:
From: Stuart Yoder
Remove the runtime check for endianness, and for platforms
that can be bit or little endian do a compile time check.
This resolves an issue encountered building QEMU
under Yocto which was not setting --cross-prefix.
Signed-off-by:
From: Stuart Yoder
Remove the runtime check for endianness, and for platforms
that can be bit or little endian do a compile time check.
This resolves an issue encountered building QEMU
under Yocto which was not setting --cross-prefix.
Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder
---
-v2: removed the dynamic r
