On 15 September 2012 17:41, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Daniel Forsgren
> wrote:
>> 1) What is considered to be part of the "core" and what is
>> considered to be a device external to the core? To me, it looks
>> like co-processor functionality in general is considered to
aybe this could be a nice
approach.
But I'd vote for CPUARMState for now.
>
> br,
>
> /D
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Blue Swirl [mailto:blauwir...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: den 14 september 2012 19:26
>> To: Daniel Forsgren
>> Cc: qem
2 19:26
> To: Daniel Forsgren
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Basic support for ARM A15 "architectured"
> (cp15) timers
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Forsgren
> wrote:
> > This patch adds basic support for the "
On 14 September 2012 18:26, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Forsgren
>> +++ qemu-linaro-1.1.50-2012.07-modified/target-arm/helper.c 2012-09-12
>> 13:15:45.544424842 +0200
>> @@ -1012,9 +1012,11 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCP
>> if (arm_feature(en
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Forsgren
wrote:
> This patch adds basic support for the "architected" timers (i.e. cp15)
> found in A15. It's enough to allow Linux to boot, using arch_timer for
> the tick. However - it is not a complete model of the timer block at
> large, it is not that
This patch adds basic support for the "architected" timers (i.e. cp15)
found in A15. It's enough to allow Linux to boot, using arch_timer for
the tick. However - it is not a complete model of the timer block at
large, it is not that well structured, and it is currently tested with
qemu-linaro-1.1.5
